On Thursday December 9 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada division of the Liberal Party of Canada is expected to deliver its opinion (and note that it is only an opinion, not a legal decision) on the subject of homosexual marriage. Note that being Thursday, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy and Will & Grace is on, so the decision might be delayed.
The Liberals sent the matter to the Supremes because being liberals, they lacked the intellectual fortitude and leadership ability (not to mention the cajones) to decide to act as lawmakers and so they simply shuffled it off to this other division of the Party to maintain electability later on.
Since the Supreme Court of Canada division of the Party is among the most strident supporters of liberal-left secularism, liberalism, and social re-engineering that the Party has, it is expected that on Thursday they will proffer from high upon their elitist perch that to their eye, gays have every right in the world to be married in the traditional sense. Damn the, uh, “other” traditions, like that tradition of millions of married couples who thought marriage was something else entirely; and damn that funky science of human creation. Damn Canada as we know it, and learn to see your country with a more queer eye, for God’s sake…. well, actually, never mind that last bit, apparently….
Then the justices will shuffle off to consider other appropriate changes for Canadian society on our behalf.
Taking their cue from the Hollywood flop “Alexander”, they are expected to announce their finding was based on the “fact” that the father of Canadian confederation, John A. Macdonald, Conservative, was actually a gay porno star, therefore he intended for Canada to be gay (in both the homo sense and the traditional 1867 sense), and ipso facto Canada is a gay-marriage nation by tradition. Voilà . Case closed. Let’s enjoy a Hot Pocket.
As such, they will edit the preamble to SCHEDULE B of Canada’s Constitution to remove the offensive sentence fragment: “Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God”, by replacing “God” with “the orgasm” which is more befitting liberal-left doctrine.
No word on whether they will describe in any detail how gay people are to create Canadian families for the future of their Canada, but you can be sure if they do it will be broadcast on the state-run CBC in prime time to ensure the kiddies get a good look. Perhaps they’ll recommend another universal social program. Possible names: “Families Unlike Canadians Know – Canada”. I’m sure it could be shortened into an acronym.
Svend Robinson’s special political friend in Parliament, the New Democratic Party’s Bill Siksay (he replaced the disgraced Robinson after Robinson committed a criminal act by stealing a multi-thousand-dollar wedding ring for his gay lover in yet another blithe display of multi-faceted liberal-left ethical morass), has already drafted a private member’s bill seemingly in preparation for changing Canada as we know it—without delay. Nothing is more important to these people than gay marriage and liberalizing Canada in their queer eye image. They work with a speed uncharacteristic of their union labor/NDP heritage.
Meanwhile terrorists are licking their chops as Canadians appear to be behaving exactly as they figured—and hoped. Even to the point of continuing to ignore the beleaguered Canadian military following 9/11.
The gay lobby and gay industry is absolutely tiny, but manifestly vocal, and apparently very convincing to the short-sighted, weak-minded, and valueless liberal-left. Viewing issues with a queer eye, the eye of a Supreme Court justice or that of any other liberal is all very amusing, but I feel as if my view and the view of millions of other straight Canadians is just as valid and is worth just as much.
Below is the letter I’m sending to all Liberal Party MPs. They are notably on the fence about this issue because of their lack of values and principles and leadership acuity. As we know, they have no moral absolutes, only moral relatives and an avidity to “go with the flow” no matter where the creek leads. That’s fine—that’s what makes them liberals, and Canada is all about the diversity.
Incidentally, there’s no use appealing to the secularists in the socialist NDP camp, though some Bloc Quebecois members might be forced to reckon with what they must surely view through their eyes as their annoying Catholic base. Conservatives are already largely on board, so no use bothering them either.
I posted a list of all MPs at our web site, and invite all readers to send their letters to Liberal Party MPs, and to post your own letters on our site for others to see.
December 6 2004
Members of the Liberal Party Caucus
House of Commons,
Ottawa, CanadaDear Members:
All Members of Parliament ought to think of the future of Canada—of building our great nation. They should remind themselves also of the past—that in fact strong traditional Canadian families built this nation. They should also remind themselves that millions of Canadian families stand ready to actively defend their place in its history and its future—to, in fact, defend Canada.
Nothing builds nations but families, quite literally, and entirely naturally.
Marriage between a man and a woman has been afforded special status in law, taxation, and even in the hearts and minds of Canadians, for very good reason—traditional families are alone responsible for the very continuity of life itself. Traditional couples create and maintain families and make great sacrifices and commitments to do so. For that Canadians afford them special benefits and rules and recognition—to make life for that family less uncertain and our very nation’s future more certain.
None of the major religions on earth recognize homosexual marriage as legitimate, and this is based on a foundation of wisdom and foresight.
In speaking of the homosexual lobby’s self-ascribed “right” to “gay marriage”, we are not talking about the right to equal access to commonly available social or government services, or to equal treatment under criminal laws or in gaining employment or owning property, etcetera. Nor are we speaking of an abrogation of the right to love one another. Rather the issue speaks to a fallaciously assumed “right” to the special status and treatment afforded only to those who enter into a traditional marriage; with all the respect and benefits and prestige that other Canadians bestow upon them and for good reason: they are the very foundation—and future—of our nation.
As you know, Members of Parliament were elected to represent all members of the constituencies they represent—not just special minority interests like the homosexual lobby and industry. The broader interest of Canadian families and indeed of Canada as a nation—in fact the whole world we live in—depend on the protection and encouragement of the traditional, nuclear family unit. It’s really just that simple.
I’m writing to encourage you to work to maintain the traditional definition of marriage. I will not support candidates who vote or in any way work against the traditional Canadian family; and will in fact engage in a concerted effort to unseat those who favor appeasing minority interests and changing the definition of marriage. I will direct all of my attention: campaign money, influence in my community, and physical campaign effort—to elect politicians who stand up for traditional Canadian families and to unseat those who work against this basic principle inherent in our nationhood.
I suggest you stress your traditional, natural, pro-family values in order to maintain a great and prosperous Canada into the future.
Yours truly,
Joel Johannesen
By Joel Johannesen
This editorial is posted at ProudToBeCanadian.ca. Here is the exact link to the editorial:
http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/threads/showflat.php?Number=3108
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Wow what a shock: a Big Government project’s cost estimate has DOUBLED — in only a few months - Tuesday April 30, 2024 at 4:50 pm
- UPDATED: State-Funding of Sports Boondoggles Need To Be Sent To The Penalty Box - Wednesday March 13, 2024 at 4:44 pm
- I’m from the government and I’m here to help you become barely mediocre like us. - Tuesday March 5, 2024 at 11:53 am
