The abandonment of moral values is working wonders for the liberals’ famous “progressive” movement. Liberals couldn’t be happier than when they’re reading about how younger and younger boys and girls are having sex and especially gay sex.
Progressive, liberal Hollywood and progressive, liberal academia are working in concert to provide fantastic survey results for them, such as these (and I imagine the fantastic liberal role-model Bill Clinton and his leadership in the area of oral sex has a lot to do with the “progressive” liberal results):
Ninth graders believe oral sex is more acceptable than “regular” sex for their age group, that it carries little to no risk of spreading sexually transmitted infections and they feel less guilty and “bad” about themselves if they have oral rather than vaginal sex, new research reveals.
About one in five 14-year-olds have tried oral sex and one in three intend to have it within the next six months, according to the first comprehensive study to delve into teens’ perceptions of the consequences of oral sex.
The story goes on and on about the study, but only once mentions the term “moral values” which strikes me as exemplary of how liberal and lacking in moral compass our nation has become, to the delight of “progressive” liberals.
To me, this story is all about the morals. Yes I’m concerned about the diseases, but at the root of the story—of the problem—is the morals. It also happens to be the “solution” to the problem, but liberals don’t look for solutions—that would render them useless—they look for methods of maintaining the problem. “Solving problems” is as picayune a matter to liberals as “ethics”.
The moral issue is not what’s important to the scientists who conducted the study, nor the media, nor even liberal parents, it seems. They seem more concerned about how they can ensure that little boys and girls can continue to have sex—just without the nasties being spread around. “Health” to them is a word used to describe how far they can push the envelope while still have an orgasm —age notwithstanding, in fact the earlier the better.
Have you ever noticed how much of the liberals’ philosophy and politics and programs revolve around the word “orgasm”?
“..although 14-year-old girls were more likely than boys to say vaginal sex, at their age, goes against their moral beliefs more than oral sex. “
Other than that one mention of morals, it’s as if they tried to avoid the question of moral values in this study and in the report about it. All they care about is the science of spreading disease such that we can all still have sex at any time or place at any age, between any two partners for any reason.
“We’re not judging,” said Halpern-Felsher, associate professor of adolescent medicine at the University of California. “I have a 9-year-old, and if she, in several years, had to make a choice, I’d rather that oral sex was the choice. There’s no doubt that it’s less risky.”
But, she said, “the fact that teens are telling us that not only is it less risky in terms of STDs (sexually transmitted diseases) and pregnancy but that they’re less likely to have their reputation hurt or to get into trouble or to feel guilty is a little concerning to me. It’s still an intimate relationship. You’re still giving of yourself.”
She said parents, caregivers, doctors and other health-care professionals need to be explicit when they talk to youth about sex. Most safe-sex messages focus solely on vaginal sex.
“We need to just open the door and start talking about oral sex,” Halpern-Felsher says. “It’s very important to open the conversation and say, ‘yes, (oral sex) is less risky in terms of STDs and pregnancy risks, but it still is an intimate relationship and you need to decide whether you’re ready for that.’ And we should start talking to teens about prevention.”
Condoms and dental dams can reduce the risk of contracting and spreading infection during oral sex.
That last sentence is helpful information provided by the reporter. Thanks for that. I’ll tell the 9-year-old girl down the street.
How about mentioning the word “abstinence” just once. Or is that a word that liberals would call “extremist”, like they call those who are against the idea of ending the life of pre-born babies in the womb, now? How about mentioning the bizarre (to liberals) concept of talking to your teens and pre-teens about not having any sexual relations with anybody until much later in life? How about talking to your pre-teens about morals and ethics and giving them a compass? Again—perhaps that’s what passes as “extremist” today by the progressive liberals.
Apparently abstinence is simply not an option—they don’t even want that possibility to exist. “Prohibition” doesn’t work! “If it feels good, do it!”
The new U.S. study comes as statistics show more Canadian teens are experimenting with oral sex, and at younger ages. A 2003 Health Canada study based on 11,000 Grades 7, 9 and 11 students found 30 per cent of ninth graders had had oral sex. High school students are “hooking up” at parties for encounters that can include everything from kissing to oral sex or sexual intercourse.
Now that gay ‘marriage’ is the most important thing on the liberal agenda, our schools will no doubt be teaching the kiddies about how to have gay sex now too. To do otherwise would be discriminatory. And of course not teaching about that would reduce the number of orgasms in Canada—and that’s the main concern of liberals.
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
