One of my all-time favorite columnists, Mark Steyn, wrote a nother good one in his Washington Times space, August 8, called “Rationalizing results”.
A Canadian, there’s absolutely no doubt in my mind that as he writes, he’s thinking of how much everything he writes about liberals is even more so, back in Canada.
Read this extended snippet—but go ahead, do yourself a favor, and read the whole thing Mondays at the Washington Times:
[…] And as usual this nearly winning strategy lost yet again—this time to a weak Republican candidate with a lot of problematic baggage. As far as I understand, the official Democratic narrative is that George Bush is a moron who has nevertheless managed to steal two elections.
Big deal. Up against this crowd, that looks like petty larceny. After the Ohio vote, Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg declared “one of the biggest doubts about Democrats is that they don’t stand for anything.” That might have passed muster two years ago. Alas, the party’s real problem is that increasingly there’s no doubt whatsoever about it.
Fortunately, the Dems have found a new line of attack to counter the evil election-stealing moron. A few days ago, a Democratic National Committee press release attacked Mr. Bush for being physically fit. It seems his physical fitness comes at the expense of the nation’s lardbutt youth. Or as the DNC put it:
“While President Bush has made physical fitness a personal priority, his cuts to education funding have forced schools to roll back physical education classes and his administration’s efforts to undermine Title IX sports programs have threatened thousands of women’s college sports programs.”
Wow. I noticed my gal had put on a few pounds, but I had no idea it was Mr. Bush’s fault. That sonofabitch chickenhawk. Just for the record, “his cuts to education funding” are cuts only in the sense Mr. Hackett’s had a tremendous victory in the Ohio election: That’s to say, Mr. Bush’s “cuts to education funding” are in fact a roughly 50 percent increase in federal education funding.
Some of us wish he had cut education funding. By any rational measure, a good third of public school expenditures are completely wasted. But instead it has skyrocketed.
And the idea Mr. Bush is heartlessly pursuing an elite leisure activity denied to millions of American schoolchildren takes a bit of swallowing given that his preferred fitness activity is running. “Running” requires two things: you and ground. Short of buying every schoolkid some John Kerry $1,000 electric-yellow buttock-hugging Lycra singlet, it’s hard how “running” requires increasing federal funding.
Perhaps America could have a running czar or a National Running Commission to report on the need for a Cabinet-level runner-general. Perhaps Title IX needs to be expanded to provide a federal sneaker subsidy—a woman’s right to shoes.
But I don’t think so. Sitting behind yet another Vermont granolamobile bearing the bumper sticker “Bush Scares Me,” I found myself thinking perhaps the easiest way to reduce American childhood obesity might just to be to shout out, “Look! There’s big scary Bush. Run. Run for your lives. No, wait, there’s John Bolton, too. Better cut through the park before he puts his hands on his hips in an aggressive manner.”
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
