Friday, May 3, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

CNN: We report, we decide!

Fox News Channel‘s co-motto “we report, you decide”—is simply too honest. Too simple.  Not nuanced at all.  Too fair and balanced for the sophisticated liberal media and their liberal audience (who are accustomed to the sophisticated Will & Grace and Queer Eye For The Straight Guy).  So they invent their own style of news.  It isn’t working well at all. Fox News Channel is leading the cable news ratings war by a mile, often doubling the CNN numbers in viewership.  I wonder why.

I’m a little late to the party with this exemplary tidbit of hideously liberal media bias, but in case you missed it, let me enlighten you.  (Hat tip to “Frogg” from our conservative-friendly discussion forums).

It seems the liberals at CNN couldn’t even contain their bias, having already decided their stance on the attempted Karl Rove slander currently going on in the liberal media.  Never mind any stupid grand juries or investigations.  CNN knows the scoop because they’re liberals, and this is potentially a bad story for conservatives. (Liberals in Canada apparently do have to wait, however, for the Gomery Report to be fully completed and released before deciding anything at all—the sworn testimony admitting corruption and the Auditor-General’s damning 2004 final report and the RCMP’s criminal charges and ongoing criminal investigations into Liberal Party criminal activity notwithstanding.)

It seems CNN anchor Lou Dobbs was introducing a piece about Karl Rove and his alleged involvement in uttering the name of a supposedly covert CIA agent (who posed in Vanity Fair with her husband in 2003), on Friday’s show—almost as if there was anything illegal about that (there isn’t).

Lou speaks:
“…Rove testifying that he first learned about Plame from columnist Robert Novak, a CNN contributor. Dana Bash reports.”

Just as the story was about to roll, the show’s audience can hear a woman saying quietly in the background, “that’s bullsh**”. Then CNN reporter Dana Bash carries on with her big (ever-so-honest, unbiased, fair and balanced!) story. 

As Frogg says:

I guess this is CNN’s attempt to move from being “biased” to being “subliminally suggestive”.

I think Valerie Plame already subliminally suggested her identity when she posed with her husband for Vanity Fair magazine in 2003.

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel

Popular Articles