God is stupid!
And therefore, I demand that the court recognize my God-given human right to have equally as much money as Bill Gates on the basis that I really really wanna have that much cash. Ipso facto I deserve it and our Charter (which begins and I quote, “Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law…”) discriminates against me.
Huh? Well I’m a total nutbar; I have no respect for anyone or any thing except my own personal greedy and insane wants and demands; God is a big stupidhead who clearly doesn’t know how to party; and there are just enough stupid people in this country…
Or to put it another way, I am apparently the only one who has had it up to HERE with the gay industry pushing this kind of total, utter, garbage down our throats.
PUSH BACK. WITH VIGOR. That was just a suggestion.
Lesbian asks court to grant status as boy’s third parent
Case could grant London woman’s partner the same rights as child’s biological father
UNNATI GANDHI
TORONTO—A woman in London, Ont., wants the Ontario Court of Appeal to recognize her as the third parent of a boy she’s raising with her lesbian partner.
The application, if allowed, would be believed to mark the first time in Canada a child would legally have more than two parents, and would fundamentally change the definition of the word “family.”
[Joel says: Gee. The gay industry hasn’t already done that…]
The biological father and mother and her female partner must remain anonymous because of a court ruling protecting their identities.
“The family has evolved over the years in a way that the law should recognize the reality of this little boy,” said the father’s lawyer, Alfred Mamo, “his reality being that he’s got two mothers and a father with whom he thrives. They all want this for their son.”
The original application made three years ago, requesting a declaration of parenthood, would give the mother’s same-sex partner the same rights as if she were a biological parent. It failed because the family court ruled that it did not have the authority to make the decision.
The applicant appealed, arguing that she was in a special situation because same-sex couples require assisted human reproduction.
So if the law does not allow for three parents, it is a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantee of equality, she argued.
“It’s discriminatory, because one of them gets legally recognized—the biological mother—but the non-biological mother, who is equally part of the process except for the biological bits, can’t be legally recognized […]
(Hat tip to conservativegal)
They’re pushing the envelope yet again to see just how liberal and stupid society has become, just as they did years ago with the then ridiculous-sounding concept of gay people getting “married” and, having families that they somehow bought or arranged in test tubes or whatever —was first brought up.
Soon, this discussion will be old, and folks will cave and say, “oh what the hell, let them have that one more thing and THEN they’ll be done asking for more changes to our country’s values and our foundational social fabric… and besides the secular progressives say this won’t affect the nature of our society one little bit. And besides, it doesn’t affect me personally so…”
Yup. The progressive forces are nearly done. Just this one little thing. Then they’ll stop.
Good luck with that.
I listen to this ditty when these things come up so I don’t throw my stapler across the room.
Click the play button once or twice to make it play.
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
