Another excellent catch on NewsBusters.org today, as they catch ABC News apparently surprised and probably rather frustrated at the pro-Bush support amongst Katrina victims. African-American victims at that. So sad! And after all that anti-Bush finger-pointing media effort! And all that race-baiting and demogoguery! And they went all that way and had to put on gumboots! It was so perfect on paper!
To ABC’s Surprise, Katrina Victims Praise Bush and Blame Nagin
Posted by Brent Baker on September 16, 2005 – 00:50.ABC News producers probably didn’t hear what they expected when they sent Dean Reynolds to the Houston Astrodome’s parking lot to get reaction to President Bush’s speech from black evacuees from New Orleans. Instead of denouncing Bush and blaming him for their plight, they praised Bush and blamed local officials. Reynolds asked Connie London: “Did you harbor any anger toward the President because of the slow federal response?” She rejected the premise: “No, none whatsoever, because I feel like our city and our state government should have been there before the federal government was called in.” She pointed out: “They had RTA buses, Greyhound buses, school buses, that was just sitting there going under water when they could have been evacuating people.”
Not one of the six people interviewed on camera had a bad word for Bush—despite Reynolds’ best efforts. Reynolds goaded: “Was there anything that you found hard to believe that he said, that you thought, well, that’s nice rhetoric, but, you know, the proof is in the pudding?” Brenda Marshall answered, “No, I didn’t,” prompting Reynolds to marvel to anchor Ted Koppel: “Very little skepticism here.”
Reynolds pressed another woman: “Did you feel that the President was sincere tonight?” She affirmed: “Yes, he was.” Reynolds soon wondered who they held culpable for the levee breaks. Unlike the national media, London did not blame supposed Bush-mandated budget cuts: “They’ve been allocated federal funds to fix the levee system, and it never got done. I fault the mayor of our city personally. I really do.”
It seemed like none of it went right for the news hound. In the full transcripts provided at NewsBusters.org, we find the people saying things like this:
Reynolds: “Now, Mary, you were rescued from your house which was basically submerged in your neighborhood. Did you hear something in the President’s words that you could glean some hope from?”
Mary: “Yes. He said we’re coming back, and I believe we’re coming back. He’s going to build the city up. I believe that.”
[…]
Reynolds: “Now, Brenda, you were, spent, what, several days at the Superdome, correct?”
Marshall: “Yes, I did.”
Reynolds: “What did you think of what the President told you tonight?”
Marshall: “Well, I think—I think the speech was wonderful, you know, him specifying that we will return back and that we will have like mobile homes, you know, rent or whatever. I was listening to that pretty good. But I think it was a well fine speech.”
Damn the people—am I right, liberals?
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am