The liberal-left in Canada must be salivating over this idea. Libby Davies are you on this? Well get on it! Liberals? Could this be part of your prostitution-legalization plans in Canada? Well I think it oughta be! If it isn’t, someone’s bound to complain and demand it—and how could you say no? It must be in the Charter somewheres! COTLER!
Danes take care of disabled to new level
National Post
September 19, 2005Danish activists for the disabled are staunchly defending a government campaign that pays sex workers to provide sex once a month for disabled people.
Opposition parties call the program, officially known as ‘‘Sex, irrespective of disability,’’ immoral.
‘‘We spend a large proportion of our taxes rescuing women from prostitution. But at the same time we officially encourage carers [sic] to help contact with prostitutes,’’ said Social-Democrat spokesperson Kristen Brosboel.
Responded Stig Langvad of the country’s Disabled Association: ‘‘The disabled must have the same possibilities as other people. Politicians can debate whether prostitution should be allowed in general, instead of preventing only the disabled from having access to it.’‘
Oh that last sentence is a gem… see, government prevents disabled people from having sex. Government is God in the liberal-left world view.
But the headline appeals to my inner sobriety too. It speaks to the “progressive” nature of liberalism. The slippery slopeyness. After they finish fully implementing this plan (this “new level”), do you think their job will be complete? They’ll just maintain the status quo from here on in because this is the pinnacle of progressiveness and liberalism? No more “progressing” after this?
And in Canada: after “gay marriage”, do you think the liberal-left is done? Job “fully completed” now?
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am