In our Columnist section today, in which conservative thoughts are leaking out all over the place much to the bitter outrage of liberals all across Canada, Rebecca Hagelin, for example, writes about how and why she thinks the left (hi liberals!) are wrong on President Bush’s Supreme Court nominee (note to liberal Canadians and Paul Martin idol worshippers: he’s a nominee, not an appointee. I know! Weird!).
The American Bar Association says John Roberts is “well qualified” to sit on the Supreme Court. Former Attorney General Edwin Meese calls him “a judge of unquestionable integrity and proven fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law.” After he made the rounds on Capitol Hill, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., labeled him “a credible nominee” who apparently lacked “a record that in any sense could be described as extremist.”
As one Democratic lawmaker told The Washington Post, “This was a smart political choice from the White House. I don’t think people see a close vote here.”
But some folks on the radical left beg to differ. They seem determined to trash John Roberts any way they can.
Three others, Mike Adams, Paul Jackson, and Salim Mansur also add their thoughts in our Columnist section today. This should be a heavy angry emails from liberals day for me today.
Mike Adams writes a letter to closet conservatives—of which Canada is well-endowed. Paul Jackson tackles the Chretien syndrome taking over the Progressive Conservative Party in Alberta. And Salim Mansur graces us with his take on the positive developments in Iraq and their continued, positive, political rebuilding.
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
