Like the increasingly bizarre liberals in the House of Representatives did before them, liberals in the U.S. Senate yesterday voted to surrender to the Islamists, precisely as demanded by them.
Go team.
Presumably, had President Bush not promised to veto the stupidity, liberal fax machines would already be zipping off congratulatory memos to the quintessentially Kyoto-friendly carbon-neutral bonfire-heated stone-age suite of caves of Usama bin Laden advising him of exactly how long he has to lay low before he can move once again get into medieval savage action figure mode; and of course also to the bombastic Iranian President Ahmadinejad who will essentially take over Iraq before moving on with other plans to which the liberals will similarly accede.
Apparently liberals will accede to pretty much anything Islamists demand, here or abroad.
The strategy of voting to tell your enemy that you’re about to surrender—and here’s the date!—is not something I’ve ever read in any war or history book or book which wasn’t a comic book—or even in a comic book come to think of it. At least not with a successful outcome to the surrenderer. I’ve only ever read such things from the Islamist terrorists who demanded it, and from the likes of the bizarre little Jack Layton and his automaton minions in the you’ve got to be kidding party and from most of those in the increasingly bizarre Liberal Party, and by some other liberal-leftists around the world.
It’s really quite astonishing. But thank God we have President Bush in the White House. And as a Canadian patriot, yes, I used the word “we” advisedly.
Bush Repeats Veto Threat on Spending Bill That Includes Iraq Withdrawal Timetable
WASHINGTON — President Bush renewed his veto threat on an Iraq spending bill on Wednesday in the face of a defiant Senate that is set to pass legislation that includes an order for U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq beginning 120 days after the bill is signed into law.
That’s never going to happen, Bush says.
If I were the Prime Minister of Canada or hoped to be one, I’d already be on year five of selling the Canadian population on the necessity of joining that noble mission in Iraq as all western civilized nations should already have, sending the unmistakable signal to the radical Islamists of the world—including in Canada—that we will not accede; which would have brought a far swifter and perhaps more decisive and satisfactory end to the Islamist reign of murder and rape and torture and use of weapons of mass destruction and tyranny and savage medieval barbarism. Then again if more of the world had the balls to join the fight as it should have, we wouldn’t likely be on year five.
And as I did in my entry about the House vote, let me add a tidbit in Arabic for those liberals who seem inclined to learn the language:
Allahu Akbar =
الله أكبر
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
