Official PTBC Logo - Copyright 2000
Monday, December 23, 2024
Official PTBC Logo - Copyright 2000

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Supreme Court flushes toilet again. Room still stinks. Canadians remain in room.

Anything goes in liberal land.  Anything. 

Canada’s top court says clubs that feature group sex and partner-swapping are perfectly legal.

In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada said, because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society, it shouldn’t be considered criminal.

The ruling sets a single standard, after lower courts went in opposite directions on two similar cases involving a pair of so-called ‘swinger clubs’ in Montreal.

In one case, the owner of a singles club was convicted on two counts of keeping a common bawdy house and fined a total of $7,500.

James Kouri’s Coeur a Corps featured a dance floor around which a black curtain would swing every half hour. People hidden behind the drapery could then take part in or watch sex acts.

In the other case, Jean-Paul Labaye ran a the owner of the members-only “liberated couples” club L’Orage was also convicted of keeping a bawdy house and fined $2,500.

Members of Labaye’s club could enter a locked room where they could take participate in or watch sex acts.

While Kouri’s conviction was overturned by the Quebec court of appeal, Labaye’s was upheld. Because a judge dissented in each of those decisions, they both wound up in front of the Supreme Court.

Under the Criminal Code, a “bawdy house” is defined as a place used or frequented for prostitution or “for the purpose of acts of indecency.”

Because there was no money paid for the sex acts at the heart of the two cases, the prostitution issue was moot—leaving the case to be decided in terms of indecency.

The definition of indecency is typically measured against what ordinary Canadians will tolerate.

But in their ruling Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said the test for indecency should not simply be whether an activity violates a “social consensus” of community standards, but the actual harm it causes.

“Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society,” Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the majority decision.

The decision is expected to open the door for venues across Canada to begin offering their facilities to consenting adults for the purposes of group sex—without fear of legal reprisals.

UPDATE Dec 26 2005:
And here’s the CNN.com story
.  Let’s hope that like many liberal policies and laws, this liberal law continues to attract the best and the brightest to our country. Don’t forget to flush!

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

Popular Articles