Steven Milloy of JunkScience.com —one of our weekly columnists—sent me an article (separate from his column) that he’s written that should cause quite a stir within the environmentalist industry and those who bow to their every dictum. It should (and I stress “should”) serve as a mighty wake-up call.
Steven Milloy won’t take credit for it, apparently, but I’ll go ahead and credit him for methodically alerting the world (starting a long time ago) to the “junk science” that surrounds the ban on the pesticide DDT—a ban which has been employed all over the world, resulting in the death of countless millions of people from malaria—all thanks to the ridiculous environmentalist industry which relies much more heavily on political science and indeed “junk science” than on environmental or chemical or any other kind of science. Way to go, Steven Milloy!
World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace Reverse Gear on DDT
Tens of Millions Die for Nothing?
January 8, 2005, JunkScience.com
The World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace apparently have reversed their long-standing opposition to the use of DDT to fight malaria. In his column in the New York Times (Jan. 8), Nicholas Kristof quotes spokesmen from WWF and Greenpeace as supporting the use of DDT in anti-malarial programs:
- “I called the World Wildlife Fund, thinking I would get a fight. But Richard Liroff, its expert on toxins, said he could accept the use of DDT when necessary in anti-malaria programs. ‘South Africa was right to use DDT,’ he said. ‘If the alternatives to DDT aren’t working, as they weren’t in South Africa, geez, you’ve got to use it. In South Africa it prevented tens of thousands of malaria cases and saved lots of lives.’”
- “At Greenpeace, Rick Hind noted reasons to be wary of DDT, but added: ‘If there’s nothing else and it’s going to save lives, we’re all for it. Nobody’s dogmatic about it.’”
DDT was banned by the U.S.—and for practical purposes by the rest of the world—in 1972 following an intense lobbying campaign by the Environmental Defense Fund. Tens of millions of people—mostly pregnant women and children—have died from malaria during the last 30 years. Many, if not most, of these deaths may have been avoided had DDT been more widely used.
The WWF nevertheless maintains on its web site that “DDT should be phased out and ultimately banned.” Greenpeace has long called for banning DDT, and has been a leading advocate of the POPs Treaty, which would make DDT more difficult to use in anti-malaria programs, if not operate as a de facto ban.
It might be easy for some to dismiss the past 43 years of eco-hysteria over DDT with a simple “Nevermind…”—a la Saturday Night Live‘s Emily Litella—except for the blood of millions of people dripping from the hands of the WWF, Greenpeace, Rachel Carson, Environmental Defense Fund and other junk science-fueled opponents of DDT.
I suppose it’s possible that WWF’s Richard Liroff and Greenpeace’s Rick Hind were misquoted by Kristof or that they don’t really mean what they say. But if they really stand-by use of DDT in anti-malarial programs, JunkScience.com calls on the World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace to apply their multi-million dollar budgets toward ensuring that not another death occurs that could have been prevented by DDT.
Check out “100 Things You Should Know About DDT” to find out how millions died for nothing.
by Steven Milloy
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Proud To Be Canadian. But Maybe Not. - Tuesday December 17, 2024 at 2:07 pm
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
