Friday, September 24, 2021
PTBC is about normal
principled conservative viewpoints.

PTBC has over 12,000 articles written by several columnists, over 20+ years.

A state-run CBC replete with an infatuation for sex, nudity, leftist propaganda

Related Articles

Joe Oliver for leader? Alas no. But heed to his leadership.

Financial Post — Joe Oliver penned a good column today offering good conservative sense for Conservatives. So that's something different and worthwhile for you to read today in the papers increasingly filled with total bunk and muck — usually from lefties — about how the Conservatives need to go still further leftward to win. It's headlined "Conservatives must persuade the electorate, not pander to the left." And it's worth your read.

"...There is an economic and cultural route to broaden the appeal of Conservative values and policies: bring the public to you, rather than mimic the left-wing’s latest faddish ideals and retreaded socialist truths. That is what leadership is all about. ..."

Ronald Reagan believed in and practiced this philosophy very effectively, making wonderful speaches counseling his fellow conservatives to speak up — "in bold colors" — to convince the electorate to vote for the values — conservative values — which most of their fellow electorate actually already believed in. And he was one of the best and most popular presidents in US history. Joe Oliver wrote today about some of those Canadian conservative values, which, similarly, are actually Canadian values.
Joe Oliver isn't running to be the leader. He's 81 and is rightly enjoying retirement. But anybody who wants to follow in Ronald Regan's — or Joe Oliver's — footsteps is more than welcome to step up at this time, please.

Advice to GOP, which Canada’s CPC should heed: Just. Say. No.

Washington Post — From this surprising source  — the...

Lefty Mayor caught maskless but it’s ok: “I was feelin’ the spirit!”

National Review — Another article you won't read in 99% of the "news" media because, oh do I even have to say it?... she's a lefty mayor! (and we can well imagine the "news" media's faux outrage if she was a he and he was a Republican):

The mayor of San Francisco [London Breed] says that she shouldn’t be criticized for breaking her own COVID rules, because, and I quote, “I was feeling the spirit and I wasn’t thinking about a mask.” CBS reports:

“We don’t need the fun police to come in and micromanage and tell us what we should or shouldn’t be doing,” said Breed during an interview to address the controversy.

The city’s health order states attendees at live indoor performances must remain masked except when actively eating or drinking. Breed maintained that she was drinking at the time.

“My drink was sitting at the table,” said Breed. “I got up and started dancing because I was feeling the spirit and I wasn’t thinking about a mask.”
As Charles C.W. Cooke points out, the hideousness doesn't stop just at her hypocrisy, her failure to take responsibility for her own actions, or her elitist rule-breaking, it's the fact that she laments the notion of "the fun police," when, in fact, as mayor and as the perpetrator of these asinine rules, she IS "the fun police."

Best post-election headline so far

Wall Street Journal — They get the headline just about right: Their opener:

The late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher counseled that in politics “standing in the middle of the road is very dangerous. You get knocked down by the traffic from both sides.” That’s the lesson delivered to Canada’s Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole in Monday’s national election.

I like that they added this because Canadian "news" media are loathed to mention it:

Yet while they again won the popular vote, they finished a distant second in seat count with about 119, two seats down from 2019. (By the way, the Tories have won the popular vote in five of the last six elections, which is a lesson for Americans who think this only happens because of the Electoral College.)

They see what I see. O'Toole: Speaking in pale pastels — largely pink — instead of bold colors. Lesson #596 for the Conservative Party of Canada. They'll learn someday. Maybe.
Read the WSJ take here. (Free link)

BC’s NDP gov and their “news” media divisions hiding stats and facts? Here’s one.

health-infobase.canada.ca For all the noise from the Canadian national "news" media, you'd think Ontario was the only province in the country, and that it's doing terribly with regard to the Wuhan Virus (which everybody still calls "COVID" on orders from the Communist Party of China). That's not news to anyone outside of Ontario. What might be news to people both outside and inside of Ontario is that BC's rate of death is nearly twice that of Ontario.
Don't worry lefties, even people in BC don't know that, because the "news" media in BC are actually cheerleaders for the NDP government of BC — much as the national news media is actually a division of the federal Liberal Party (well and the Ontario Liberal Party of course). Ontario is led by a party with the word "Conservative" in it, even though "Progressive" is the first and foremost word and concept in their party name and style of governance. But, you know, it's just deathn shit. Politics is way more important to the "news" media.
Facts. Get 'em anywhere you can, because you can't reliably get them from the "news" media.
See also:
And from liberalvision CTV: Secrecy over B.C.'s true number of hospitalized COVID-19 patients

“The government beat the citizens! Yay!” —an elitist Canadian socialist

The Liberal Party's very own state-owned CBC's "news" (hahahahaha)...

The objective left on the regressive left

Writing beautifully about the racist and discriminatory plight of...

Take a Hint, Canada.

Yahoo News — Dutch Foreign Minister Sigrid Kaag resigned on Thursday after parliament formally condemned her handling of the Afghanistan evacuation crisis.
Too bad Canada doesn't have a Parliament. Or a news media.

Canada Excluded From International China Security Pact

Globe and Mail Dismissed by Justin Trudeau as merely a crass American salesman's move to pawn off the latest high-tech US-built nuclear subs to what we have to therefore assume he thinks are the total idiot Aussies, the three-nation deal didn't even include Canada in the talks leading up to the historic pact. And after Trudeau's comments on the matter (and the aforementioned attitude toward the Aussies), you can understand why.
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Thursday played down Canada’s exclusion from the Indo-Pacific security deal, saying it is merely a way for the U.S. to sell nuclear submarines to Australia ... “This is a deal for nuclear submarines, which Canada is not currently or any time soon in the market for. Australia is.”"
In a clear indication that even Trudeau's political bro Joe Biden doesn't actually take him or Canada seriously anymore (forcing one to wonder if his high-fivin' bro Barack Obama doesn't also come off as a bit two-faced after Obama gave Trudeau a campaign "endorsement" this week), even Canadian officials were left in the dark. Almost like Canada can't even be trusted anymore on any level.

"Three officials, representing Canada’s foreign affairs, intelligence and defence departments, told The Globe and Mail that Ottawa was not consulted about the pact, and had no idea the trilateral security announcement was coming until it was made on Wednesday by U.S. President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison."

Trudeau, in contrast, delayed Canada's Wuhan Virus immunization program by signing a deal not with the Americans or Brits, but with... CHINA, for vaccines, in what turned out to be a total failure with countless Canadian lives lost as a result. What is going on here?

The Article

UPDATE (March 20, 2008): Relevant screen captures, which illustrated the reasons for my comments in this review, and which exemplified the main thrust of my critical arguments, have been removed, due to a threat of a lawsuit (citing “copyright” violations) from the law firm representing the documentary’s host and the documentary’s production company—see below.

I’m sure if an officer of the law walked in at that moment, I’d be arrested on the spot and thrown in jail for some sort of sexual/pornographic assault or some such crime against the young neighbor girl who was visiting us.  If her mom or dad walked in, I’d be whacked flat onto the ground instantly. And I’d have understood completely. 

This past Friday evening at 7:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time (and the time is key), me and the neighbor girl from down the street were chatting and watching the state-run (also a key fact) news channel called “Newsworld” (also a key fact), when we were presented with video of a man, totally frontally naked, running in extreme slow motion (also a key fact) just past the CBC cameraman, thus enabling an excruciatingly painfully close, detailed view of the man’s appendage flopping around as he ran, with the camera following him as he ran past a line of women who were also totally naked, standing there in protest against something.  Again, this was all in slo-mo. 

The young neighbor girl was shocked and then amused.  I was not.

It wasn’t a “news” story per se, as most things on the CBC—“Newsworld” or not—are not.  It was another brilliant CBC “documentary”.  Upon later review, I found it was called “Naked”.  It was all about naked people being naked in public.  The entire “documentary” was filled with scores of naked people—which the CBC showed us in vivid full-frontal graphically nude fashion. 

It wasn’t entirely about naked people though—it was manifestly another excuse to show methods by which Canadians and Americans can protest George Bush, and anything else you find offensive.

The “documentarian”, Mary Bissell, didn’t simply educate us objectively about these protest methods, as a proper journalist would do on any porno channel run by far-leftist militants.  No no.  She injected herself right into the story by—you guessed it—taking off all of her clothes and then posing for the cameras—leg lifted and spread in some weird tree-hugging photo-stunt, and most everything exposed, albeit mercifully from some distance so we couldn’t see absolutely everything her gynecologist sees.  On the state-run CBC Newsworld channel at 7:00 PM on Friday.

She was one of them.  A protester herself.  This time the protest was fallaciously portrayed as being against the B.C. government totally ruining a whole geographically significant whack of owl and eagle-laden Canadian land near Vancouver—in order, they reported, to do nothing but cut the drive time to Whistler by three minutes.  Which of course is a total lie.  But who cares?  I’m quite sure most sensible people with taste simply switched channels at this point, but some watched her getting her picture taken for a nude calendar, and watched as she wrapped her nude body around a tree in a twist on “tree hugging”.  I guess this was a sort of “tree fornicating”. 

And in fact, I really don’t see what is stopping the fringe leftists at the insane state-run CBC from doing a documentary about that next.  A “documentary’ about folks having wild monkey-sex in the middle of parks and our streets and all over our public squares.  Simply find “a good reason” for doing it—like protesting morals generally, or Christian (or plain old normal) traditional Canadian values—or hey I know—protest parents who try to raise their kids to be such suck-up innocents, and get them into the real world of “progressive” liberal bare-ass and bare-sex-organ state-run TV “news”. 

What’s to stop them? 

Here are some screen-captures of the “documentary” on CBC called Naked, broadcast at 7:00 PM on Friday September 21 2007.  In each case, I “blurred-out” the frontal nudity—the CBC did not—they showed it all:

UPDATE: SCREEN CAPTURES REMOVED AS A RESULT OF THE THREAT OF A LAWSUIT


The documentary’s host/star and production company (the CBC merely commissioned the piece) had their lawyers send a “demand letter” to me threatening to sue me if I failed to remove the relevant screen captures from this article.  They cited the fact that I failed to get permission from them to include them.  In my critical review of this documentary.  Which was shown on the state-owed CBC.  In prime time.

My feeling was and still is that under Canada’s “fair dealing” laws, fair use of such material is permitted when the purpose is fair, and it is a review or a criticism of the material; and in this case the relative importance of screen captures to exemplify the validity of my editorial arguments is rather obvious.

However, since I have lack the funds necessary to fend off this, the latest PTBC-related legal threat, I chose to abide by their demand and remove the screen captures, which were below.  I left some of the illustrative text where the screen-captures were.

The “documentary opened with this sight—which the CBC showed with full frontal nudity in very slow motion.  Why?  I think it’s because they’re perverted and don’t care about you and your family and what you think.  I blurred-out the frontal nudity—the CBC did not. 

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

“No Bush” refers to President Bush—but I’m sure the perverts at the CBC enjoyed the pun. 

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

Here is our “documentary” host Mary Bissell—second from left—injecting herself right into the story by taking off her clothes and posing with some other moonbat protesters for a cause she thinks everyone should believe in.

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

Here is our “documentary” host Mary Bissell injecting herself right into the story by taking off her clothes and doing a tree—for a cause she thinks everyone should believe in.

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

Here we see the ubiquitous big nanny-state liberal government propaganda logo logo—other “sponsors” were of course the state-run CBC and state-funded Telefilm Canada—which Canadian law forces private cable and satellite distributors to contribute to monthly.  Also as you can see, additional help was provided by tax breaks from the Liberal B.C. Government and the liberal Canadian government—on top of all the other government/taxpayer cash to present this total crap.  It was pretty much a totally state-funded (that’s communist-style) propaganda piece for you Canadians—and your children. 

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

As we can see here, it was actually “commissioned by” the state-run CBC Newsworld.

**REMOVED DUE TO LEGAL THREAT FROM DOCUMENTARY HOST AND PRODUCTION COMPANY**

Here are some other blog entries exposing the CBC and their perverted notion of what they think are “Canadian values” and their mandate:

State-run CBC in new sex series… 

The CBC Prez: We did NOT have sexuality on that network, the CBC (except testicle waxing…)

CBC is the depraved channel

“Canadian Values”, liberal-left style, again

Depraved programming accessible to our nation’s kids; brought to you by…

Once again let me remind Canadians of the obvious:  State-run and state-owned media should be banned in this country, and that notion enshrined in our constitution.

You can write a comment to the CBC here.  Or maybe just take off all your clothes, get someone to take your nude picture, and send them that picture in protest.  (I’ll bet you’ll get a call from the police if you do that—so maybe you shouldn’t.) 

 

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    Do you Have a File to Send?
    If so, choose it below

    This is just a question to make sure you're not a robot:

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    — Normally this would be an ad. It's a doggy. —spot_img