Friday, April 19, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Three things I can tell you

Name:  “Johnson”
Email: “[email protected]” (I think it’s a fake!)

His Christmas message:  It’s number 65 in the comments to my blog entry about our liberal activist Supreme Court of Canada division of the Liberal Party and its decision last week to allow wife-swapping and group sex clubs to flourish across Canada because although most Canadians did not know this, it’s another one of our official Canadian state “values” that Liberal Paul Martin and others constantly blather on about; and we’re told by the liberals that Canadians are officially in favor of this because we’re officially socially “progressive”.  And good God, this is progressive with your neighbour’s whip-cream on top! 
————————————————————-

Joel, you are a worthless, sub human, piece of sh*t.

  [The writer typed out the whole word for us of course!]

Robert, you too.
You both are just insecure with yourselves so you need to make others feel like sh*t too. Get a life, or better yet girlfriends. Although I highly doubt that’s possibly from the looks of your picture Joel.

————————————————————-
 

THREE THINGS WE KNOW FROM THIS: 

  1. The commenter is not a good social conservative.  And he clearly hates (not merely dislikes) those who are, and in fact views them as “sub human”.  Paul Martin, as we know, thinks conservatives are “un-Canadian” because we don’t share his values and those of his Supreme Court.  Recently appointed Liberal Senator Larry Campbell (a socialist) calls conservatives “Barbarians”.  Again:  “Barbarians”.  That’s me and my wife.  “Barbarians”.  This of course helps us understand those folks who aren’t social conservatives.  Oh and item 1-a:  This is one of the reasons I can so clearly identify with and define myself as a good social conservative.
  2. The fella isn’t a Christian, or a Jew, or a Muslim, or Yogic Flyer, or a believer of any of the major faiths, except the one about being “progressive” and “liberal” and an “ass”.  Oh sure he may pretend to be religious or wish he was —so many do —and there’s always hope for him of course because it’s never too late— but he isn’t a man of faith right now and it shows—it practically leaps off the page and wacks you aside the head.  So we know that too.  And we can learn from that.
  3. And we know he won’t be voting for the Conservative Party.  And therefore, since he’s obviously passionate about politics, he will likely be voting for either the Liberal Party or the NDP —certainly not the Conservative Party.  And so we now have further confirmation that that is what those parties attract.  Those are the people who want to lead our country. With those ideas.  Which again makes it easier to decide whose side I’m on.

Naturally there’s other things we know and can learn from this kind of daily lesson in politics and people and Canadians and liberal-left fundamentalism too, and I hope lots of those things absorb into you and your psyche. 

(Oh and of course we also know his IP Address which is 66.230.180.230; and he posted the comment on 2005-12-26 at 12:40 AM PST. (I’m so glad he waited until after Christmas Day itself!  How compassionate of him!))

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

Popular Articles