Nice try ASS PRESS and liberals:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
NEW YORK -— Adam Lambert’s racy American Music Awards performance cost him a gig on “Good Morning America,” but he will perform live instead on ABC’s morning rivals at CBS.
Lambert was to sing Wednesday on “GMA,” but the network said Tuesday it was canceling the openly gay singer because “we were concerned about airing a similar concert so early in the morning.”
While singing his new song, “For Your Entertainment,” at the awards program on Sunday, Lambert kissed a male keyboardist, fondled a dancer and had another dancer briefly stuff his face in Lambert’s crotch. The performance prompted many complaints to ABC, and the network cut out the brief oral sex simulation for its West Coast broadcasts.
Well actually, I don’t know what ancient planet or part of our planet ABC and the ASS PRESS is on, but it is utterly irrelevant that they benevolently cut out, for the west coast version, what they blithely describe as the “brief oral sex simulation” (as if it should be understood by us all as utterly unremarkable to be subjected to this kind of thing on primetime network TV with our kids and grandparents — see I always tell you liberal speak as though everyone in the room agrees with them!). Cutting out scenes for the west coast is a thing of the past in a satellite and digital TV world, where we west coasters can watch the east coast version or the west coast version at the push of a remote control button. Alas I guess we poor saps tuned into the east coast version because we were subjected to ugly Adam Lambert’s stinking filthy crotch. (I think I might have mentioned this a couple of times this week.) But the fact that they did cut it out for the west coasters indicates to me a measure of understanding on their part that even they at ABC know it was totally unacceptable — to the point where they had to edit it out of their own broadcast. Yet they remain defensive about it and unapologetic.
But I love how the liberal-minded proponents and defenders and enablers and endorsers of Lambert’s style of violent disgusting pig-like disrespectful “artist” performances inevitably concentrate on highlighting the fact that he is “openly gay”, as if everyone cares about nothing more than the fact that he is “openly gay”. That’s how poorly liberals understand the nature of normal humans, and certainly normal conservatives like me. Allow me to “push the envelope” of fundamental human understanding for you, liberals: Normal people like me (conservatives) couldn’t care less what his sexual proclivity is and moreover, don’t want to know —especially if he’s a perverted messed-up disgusting and disrespectful filthy pig like Adam Lambert. Liberals may be shocked to hear this, but unlike them, the first thing we think about when we see people on TV is NOT having sex with them; nor is it our desire to watch anybody have sex with anyone else in private or in public. Shock! Surprise! But live and learn, liberals. Soon possibly you’ll understand people, and that understanding will help serve the greater interests of all our communities.
But as if we didn’t all know this, this highlighting of one’s “openly gay” status is actually just done to set us up. The next step is to point at those who don’t think like them. They then think it enables them to thereby call anyone who doesn’t want to help them celebrate watching gay sex in public, and who don’t actually love watching ugly people’s faces being shoved
into the stinking grotesque sweaty crotch of ugly-ass leather-bound idiots on a stage in front of a national TV viewing audience full of children and folks of all ages… “homophobes”. They LOVE that word “homophobe” because it sounds sort of “science-y” —like the “man-made global warming” (though the word “homophobe” has even less “scientific” credibility, if you can imagine). And they use it against people who disagree with them about almost anything —but especially when it’s about very public and PR-intensive and therefore possibly terrific proponents of the morals-destruction advocacy that the liberal-left “progressive” set is all about, like the “openly gay” Adam Lambert. And manifestly, it’s used against the majority of folks who are like me: those who enjoy the normal, traditional marriages and life in general.
It’s really pretty much like what a full-on fascist like Hitler would do —and it’s an increasingly common response from liberals. If you’re against ugly pigs being disgusting in public in front of grand kids and grandma and people of all flavors and normal tastes, and making you puke your dinner up and recoil in disgust at what we just saw, then you’re a “homophobe”. Because some dumb-ass tasteless ignorant intolerant fascist liberals SAY you are.
In actual fact, nobody could give a rat’s butt if he’s “openly gay” or merely “openly disgusting” and “screwed-up in the head” and “totally moronic”, and a “disrespectful ass” and a “lousy singer”, as he also is. Actually we may care about those latter things since it’s an awards show and it’s about judging people, but certainly not that he’s “openly gay”.
But nice try, liberals.
In an upcoming blog entry, I’ll tell you what I really think!
EXTRA FASCIST
While we’re at it, let me once again recommend this fantastic book “Liberal Fascism”, by Jonah Goldberg. It’s one of the best books I’ve ever read. And it’s absolutely relevant and coincidentally related to this whole story. It is a huge New York Times best-seller, and it’s now available in paperback at a great price. It has no pictures of men’s faces being thrust into the crotch of Adam Lambert or any other morons.
- Canadian Liberals and other leftists hated America 20 years ago too - Wednesday July 23, 2025 at 3:25 pm
- “PROUD?” —PROJECT SUSPENDED - Monday July 21, 2025 at 11:35 am
- Proud To Be Canadian? Maybe Not. - Tuesday December 17, 2024 at 2:07 pm


While singing his new song, “For Your Entertainment,” at the awards program on Sunday, Lambert kissed a male keyboardist, fondled a dancer and had another dancer briefly 