Friday, March 29, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Oral sex no big deal to today’s modern liberal youth

Let me start near the end of the story.  No apocalyptic pun intended.

Sabrina Weill, a former editor in chief at Seventeen magazine … says casual teen attitudes toward sex — particularly oral sex — reflect their confusion about what is normal behavior.

Normal behavior, huh?  I think lots of people are confused about what is normal behavior.  But, see, I think that’s the desired effect.  By that I mean the desired affect of the effort put forth by many in the secular-left news and entertainment media and in academia, and of course in liberal-left government and politics. 

Teens define sex in new ways

The generational divide between baby-boomer parents and their teenage offspring is sharpening over sex.
Oral sex, that is.

More than half of 15- to 19-year-olds are doing it, according to a groundbreaking study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The researchers did not ask about the circumstances in which oral sex occurred, but the report does provide the first federal data that offer a peek into the sex lives of American teenagers.

To adults, “oral sex is extremely intimate, and to some of these young people, apparently it isn’t as much,” says Sarah Brown, director of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

“What we’re learning here is that adolescents are redefining what is intimate.”

Among teens, oral sex is often viewed so casually that it needn’t even occur within the confines of a relationship. Some teens say it can take place at parties, possibly with multiple partners.

Blurring the lines between the sexes, blurring the lines that separate “normal” from “not normal” behavior.  Literally redefining—by law—the term “Canadian family” and “marriage”.  Changing wording on birth certificates to remove the word “father” and “mother” and replacing them with “DNA-Contributor-1” and DNA-Contributor-2”.  Blurring the lines between what should be accepted and what should not (everything should —nothing is ultimately unacceptable to them—“if it feels good, do it”, and everybody else must accept it—as “normal”).  And literally forcing acceptance of what we used to consider abnormal or bad or even dangerous behavior on society—sometimes through laws, and sometimes through what I might call “amoral suasion”, like making those who don’t accept what they’d like the public to accept as normal acceptable behavior pariahs in society. “Homophobes”.  “Intolerant”.  “Not progressive”.  “Mouth-breathers”. “Conservatives”.  “Knuckle-draggers”.  “Damn Christians”.  “Morons”.

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

Popular Articles