Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Gays have rights—it’s MPs who don’t

Let me quote one of the doctrines of Canadian fringe left-wing leader, the New Democratic Party’s Jack Layton, socialist: “We don’t have free votes on human rights questions”. 

Tad ironic that.  How odd.  So you favor dictatorial power then?  How do you decide, oh great leader?  Who are you again?  Don’t remember voting for you. 

And I know there’s a whole bunch of unborn babies who are giving you an extremely tiny thumbs-up on that whole “human rights” dictate.  (Of course we know you, of all people Mr. Layton, socialist liberal, are not speaking for them.) 

Manitoba Member of Parliament Bev Desjarlais who is an NDP member, said yesterday she stands firmly opposed to same-sex marriage, and insists she will vote against Liberal legislation to change the definition of marriage.

“If there is a vote, I will be there and I will not support changing the definition,” Desjarlais said.

Layton said he intends to crack the whip to bring his caucus into party line. Party line for Layton means Ba’ath Party, apparently. But because socialists swing both ways, he also meant bath party as in a big giant hot tub. On the other hand, Layton may have been at a party and high on pot at the time because earlier in the year he promised (with Liberal Party backing) to work feverishly on their other great and noble liberal ambition for the betterment of our nation: to pass legislation legalizing pot-smoking for our kids (and himself and his caucus presumably). 

But just so we’re clear, “It’s a human rights issue. We don’t have free votes on human rights questions,” he said.  Lets review:  Human rights issue… we don’t have free votes on those….  Got it. 

But to crack a whip over it? Jack, will you be wearing leather at the time?  Is this in furtherance of your quest to nail down that sadomasochist vote now that you’ve secured the terrorist vote, the gay and lesbian and transsexual and cross-dresser vote, the street-performer vote, and of course the labor union vote; or are we just a test market (if you’ll excuse the word “market”) for your official coming out as the New Saddam o’ the North? 

Another NDP member, Nova Scotia MP Peter Stoffer, apparently not buying into Layton’s Saddam Hussein tyrany of the minority style of authoritarian rule in which insubordinates are whipped by a stoned leather-wearing dingbat, said Desjarlais should be permitted to vote with her conscience. 

“This idea of a completely whipped vote is something I fundamentally oppose on many issues because in the end the people that you represent brought you here and you have to reflect their views,” Stoffer said, not ruling out the use of whipped cream altogether.

The liberal-left often get politics confused with electability and morality and historic roots of our nation, and of course the Supreme Court they run so effectively for themselves.  Stoffer’s own words provided a clue: “…people that you represent brought you here…”. Before voting in favor of homosexual ‘marriage’, the MPs should all consult with the people who actually brought them here—who were manifestly a man and a woman dubbed mom and dad.

I’m sure lots more cracks will open up within the liberal-left. And I say that advisedly. 

But since we’re on a minority rights tangent, how about this:  as a visible minority (a conservative, thus no distinguishing nipple rings or jewels in any bodily orifice), I’d like to change the definition of Canada itself, though not as much as your gay marriage law will change the very definition of Canada.  As a protector of minority rights, liberals would have no problem with my plan.  There won’t even be a dumb old vote in the NDP ranks.  My change is thus:  To add a bit to the Canadian Constitution (right under the line that says “Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God”, which I mention just to rub it in), saying that:

“Canada is a bastion of free-market capitalism, free enterprise, free-trade; and will maintain a strong powerful military capable of defending our borders and fighting ceaselessly against tyranny and for freedom and democracy throughout the world; and is a country founded upon Judeo-Christian principles and enshrines free religious expression, especially at Christmas time, which is a Christian celebration and which, by the way, is an official state-mandated official national holiday, in some bizarre ancient church/state un-liberal misdeed of the past but one which most of us love even more than Easter”. 

I expect swift passage of my minority amendment, just as the Liberal Solicitor General Irwin Cotler promised emergency passage of their homosexual ‘marriage’ bill for those poor long suffering homosexuals in our midst. He’s in such a hurry to liberalize Canada he’s prepared to put aside all other nuisances like global terrorism and the Canadian government’s insistence on ensuring Sudan meets or beats Rwanda’s genocidal slaughter of 800,000 humans which the Liberals allowed in the 90s as a result of their being unsure of the sexual orientation of the dead. We’re only at 75,000 slaughtered in Sudan—more need to be slaughtered yet.  Sudan hasn’t even met the number of slaughtered babies aborted each year in Canada, which stands at a paltry 100,000 per year. 

But at least we won’t have to vote on it.

In the meantime, after years of the liberals in this country pushing sex education like sex was going out of style which unlike many liberal moral relatives it obviously is not; and shunning the teaching of abstinence (because like missile defence and “flight”, it’ll never fly!; and pushing ever more graphic sex-ed classes in which the kids are shown the value of having sex and how to perform sex with each other—and then to abort their babies at one of the state-run taxpayer-funded abortion mills; watch for the introduction of graphic instruction on how best to perform gay anal sex and sundry gay masturbation techniques in schools for our kids.  Note to moms, or Mr. moms:  foods rich in fiber will finally be in high demand by kids soon, so stock up! 

Failing to teach the kids how to perform anal sex and cunnilingus will clearly be seen as “homophobic” and unconstitutional now.  On the bright side, maybe the queerly-named “blow jobs” will also be redefined soon too, to more properly reflect physical reality.  Perhaps Bill Clinton could be seconded to help with the wording.  Scratch that.  “Is” was a problem for him.

The teachers may want to advise the kids, for example, to remove their tongue piercings prior to gay sex (or hetero-sex for that matter… are we allowed to say “hetero” anymore or is that homophobic? Let’s ask the Supremes!).  Either that or, once pot-smoking is OK’d by the libs, they might just recommend getting really really high on pot to ease the pain of sharp jewels upon the “family jewels”, if you will.

Of course, the term “family jewels” will have to be stricken from the record, to avoid embarrassing use of the useless old word “family” and its now-outlawed traditional meaning. 

To make it easier for the liberals, why not simply rewrite the constitution every few years, since “things change”?  Perhaps we should rewrite the Qur’an, the Vedas, and the Bible, and re-jig the notably untrendy ten Yamas of Hinduism or the ten Commandments of the Old Testament—that last sucker’s “old” after all! 

President Bush insists “freedom is on the march,” and that might certainly be true globally.  But understand what “liberal” means, and what the liberals mean by “progressive”, because that, and that alone, is what’s on the march here at home. 

By Joel Johannesen

This editorial is posted at ProudToBeCanadian.ca.  Here is the exact link to the editorial:
http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/threads/showflat.php?Number=3218

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel

Popular Articles