Friday, April 26, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Case against Ezra Levant dropped; now Ezra will have more time…

…. to win the ongoing war that has been declared against him and us.  Free Canadians. 

The Calgary Herald allowed the immigrant complainant to write a long editorial today, in which he presumes to explain Calgary and “the west” and the Canadian way to Ezra Levant, Great Canadian, of Calgary, Canada.  (Note the scare quotes he uses around the word “right”):

Human rights and the Code of the West

…Consequently, I intend to withdraw my complaint filed with the Alberta HRC against Ezra’s “right” to publish the offensive and hateful drawings. I believe the decision he took was irresponsible and was intended to stir up strife, but I now appreciate that it may not fall outside the limits of freedom of expression….

 

The case against FreeDominion was dropped too, but not before countless thousands of dollars had been spent, and countless hours, and fear and resentment and anger and angst had been deployed.  Ezra Levant supposes he’s spent in excess of $100,000 defending against “this thug” as he rightly puts it.

And there’s still a case against Mark Steyn and Maclean’s

But Ezra Levant doesn’t believe the case has actually been dropped, as he explains here: 

Syed Soharwardy wants a “hudna”

…The answer lies in another Arabic word: hudna. A hudna isn’t a peace treaty. It’s a temporary truce called by a Muslim warrior who’s losing in battle. It’s pretty easy to understand how hudnas work by watching Israel fight Hamas and Hezbollah. Those two terrorist groups lob rockets and send suicide bombers into Israel for months; then, every once in a while, Israel deploys its military and flattens Hamas and Hezbollah, who then call for a hudna. The UN intervenes, saving Hamas and Hezbollah to fight another day. That’s a hudna: a tactical truce for a strategic advantage.

Soharwardy wants a hudna because he’s losing badly…

But I’m glad Ezra Levant will now have more time to spend on fighting the war.  And he’s on it: 

…Well, back in the land of real laws and real rules of court, there’s a tort called “abuse of process”, and Soharwardy has just admitted to it.

For two years, this corrupt, radical imam has hunted me using the resources of the taxpayers of Alberta for the “thought crime” of publishing a cartoon he didn’t like. I had a preliminary discussion with my lawyer today. My aim is to file an abuse of process claim in the Court of Queen’s Bench within the month. Whether or not I sue the commission itself, and its inquisitor Shirlene McGovern, is something I haven’t discussed yet with my lawyers.

When the chief complainant in a two-year censorship exercise admits the whole thing was improper, an abuse of process suit is not just about recouping my losses. It’s about holding a little fascist, and the government agency he hijacked, to account, and having grown-ups—that is, real judges in real courts—tell them that what they’ve been doing is morally and legally wrong.

 

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

Popular Articles