Their headline provides a hint as to what’s to come. They sneeringly refer to the appointment of the twice-elected Senator-in-waiting as the (beware: media agenda-quote-marks coming!)
‘
elected
’
senator. (See here for background blog entry).
Apparently the “reporter” is unaware that as of yet—despite the noble efforts of the Conservatives —in keeping with the principles of Bill C-43, the proposed law that would enable Canadians to vote for Senators —we do not have an elected senate yet. Blame the liberal-left for that—not Canadians, who are on Harper’s Conservative side on that issue. Perhaps the “reporter” would prefer to see folks appointed on the Liberals’ crafty and tendentious “willy-nilly” basis instead of lowering ourselves to that stupid “democracy” thing (well, “thing” or “crusade”—whatever), which is of course “American-style” and therefore “Bush-like”.
In the “news” story itself, they inform you, “…Although that election does not compel Mr. Harper to appoint Mr. Brown, the Prime Minister said the move boosts the Conservative crusade.”
Now… I didn’t personally hear the Prime Minister claim—outright “say”—that “the move boosts the Conservative crusade,” but I guess it’s possible. I’d sure like the “reporter”, Brian Laghi, or the Globe and Mail’s editors to provide me with that exact quote. That would be the Christian “crusade-ish” thing to do—am I right, liberals?
- Canadian Liberals and other leftists hated America 20 years ago too - Wednesday July 23, 2025 at 3:25 pm
- “PROUD?” —PROJECT SUSPENDED - Monday July 21, 2025 at 11:35 am
- Proud To Be Canadian? Maybe Not. - Tuesday December 17, 2024 at 2:07 pm


