Thursday, March 28, 2024

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Al Gore bullied scientists into changing their views on climate change to match his

Note: this ties in well with a previous blog entry:  60 leading international climate change experts tell Harper Kyoto is bogus.

So says Richard Lindzen in a very interesting piece this morning in the Wall Street Journal’s OpinionJournal.com.  Richard Lindzen is a Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.

He raises a variation on the theme that was put forward in the best-seller “State of Fear” by Michael Chrichton

Climate of Fear

Global-warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.

BY RICHARD LINDZEN
Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:01 a.m. EDT

There have been repeated claims that this past year’s hurricane activity was another sign of human-induced climate change. Everything from the heat wave in Paris to heavy snows in Buffalo has been blamed on people burning gasoline to fuel their cars, and coal and natural gas to heat, cool and electrify their homes. Yet how can a barely discernible, one-degree increase in the recorded global mean temperature since the late 19th century possibly gain public acceptance as the source of recent weather catastrophes? And how can it translate into unlikely claims about future catastrophes?

The answer has much to do with misunderstanding the science of climate, plus a willingness to debase climate science into a triangle of alarmism. Ambiguous scientific statements about climate are hyped by those with a vested interest in alarm, thus raising the political stakes for policy makers who provide funds for more science research to feed more alarm to increase the political stakes. After all, who puts money into science—whether for AIDS, or space, or climate—where there is nothing really alarming? Indeed, the success of climate alarmism can be counted in the increased federal spending on climate research from a few hundred million dollars pre-1990 to $1.7 billion today. It can also be seen in heightened spending on solar, wind, hydrogen, ethanol and clean coal technologies, as well as on other energy-investment decisions.

But there is a more sinister side to this feeding frenzy. Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their grant funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves libeled as industry stooges, scientific hacks or worse. Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science that supposedly is their basis.

[… Read the rest (3 minutes) … ]

Joel Johannesen
Follow Joel
Latest posts by Joel Johannesen (see all)

Popular Articles