Canadian Press wishful thinking ….and yet actual headline: “Harper gets mixed reviews about success of charm offensive”
And here’s the whole story. This is it. The entire whole complete story. From beginning to end, which proves (proves!) that Stephen Harper is getting “mixed reviews” about his “offensive”, or to put “offensive” in another way, his afront against Canadians to somehow “con” (or better yet, “neo-con”!) them into thinking that he’s not a complete ass, and an “angry”, “bitter man” as has ever-so-accurately been portrayed with a palpable giddiness in the liberal-leftist media:
TORONTO (CP) – Stephen Harper’s attempt to remake himself into a kinder, more electable Conservative leader is getting mixed reviews from some of his MPs.
James Moore of B.C. says Harper has pulled out all the stops to show people that he’s a thoughtful and, more importantly, approachable leader.
But veteran Loyola Hearn of Newfoundland is not as effusive, saying Harper has a lot of work to do because perceptions can’t be reversed at the drop of a hat.
Harper received a standing ovation from Tory MPs and senators who’ve gathered in the Ontario capital for a mid-summer review of party election strategy and finances.
Harper is also announcing a new party environment and transport policy that proposes tax breaks for using mass transit.
Where’s the negative review from any Conservative MPs or anyone else? Loyola Hearn is not as “effusive”? Moore was “effusive”?
That’s it? That commands a headline reading that Mr. Harper is getting “mixed reviews about success of charm offensive”?
Nope! No liberal bias in the media!
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
