Do you know the true extend of state-ownership of businesses which compete against citizens?
Who knew Purolator Couriers Ltd was 91% owned by the 100% state-owned Canada Post “Corporation?”
If you didn’t know, that’s horrible. But what’s just about as bad is the idea that it’s intentional. Progressive governments, socialists, liberals – progressives as a general matter — have a long record of meddling in and then purposely blurring the lines of “corporate” Canada, with even more success here than they have in the United States. Countless “corporations” are really divisions of government disguised as “corporations”. They all have their web pages, their “corporate” logos which look every bit as slick and commercial as real corporations, they all have “CEOs” and so on.
- The Ontario (or BC or any of a number of other provincial) Lottery “Corporation.” It’s a 100% state-owned operation, run by government appointees (and this is to say nothing of the the questionable moral judgment inherent in a government being involved in this sort of thing, as if gambling is now a core function of government)
- The BC Ferry “Corporation.” It’s 100% state-owned and operated by government appointees.
- The Insurance “Corporation” of BC. 100% state-owned and run by government appointees. And a monopoly. Which nonetheless advertises.
- Via Rail. 100% state-owned.
- CBC or Canadian Broadcasting “Corporation.” 100% state-owned and run by government appointees.
- Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
- Canada Lands Company
- Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
- Canadian Museum of Civilization
- CN Tower
- Hibernia oil (partial ownership)
- Mortgages bought from banks
- National Gallery of Canada
- Old Port of Montreal Corporation
- Royal Canadian Mint
- Telefilm Canada
- And a great many others.
All 100% state-owned. And others are so massively controlled by and are subject to so many rules and regulations and policies set forth by all-encompassing governments, and/or are so reliant upon “grants” and “loans” and “loan guarantees” and “stimulus” (–wink!) and “bailout” cash, they might as well be and really are effectively “owned” by the state. But that’s another tangent.
You don’t have to look far to see how it’s working. I once cited the example of an outraged British Columbia citizen who felt he was being ripped off, and so he sued the “corporation” which was the object of his ire. “It’s about keeping corporations honest, that’s really what it’s about,” he was quoted in the newspaper as saying (without even a question about this malapropism from the paper’s reporter). Oh I see. It’s about keeping the “corporation” honest. The “corporation” he’s speaking of? The BC Lottery “Corporation.” Another score for honest government – and progressives.
Purolator, like many other such “corporations” (–wink!) cast themselves as just another regular business 
just out there competing fairly in the plain old free marketplace. But this one is 91% owned by a 100% state-owned division of the government. And a monopoly (regular envelope mail delivery) at that. And now, after investing millions and millions into a parcel delivery “company,” Purolator is the biggest parcel delivery “company” in the country. They’ve squashed all their competition. Too bad their competition turns out to be citizens using their own cash, trying to make a go of it for themselves and their families. And I mean all kinds of citizens — those who have started with nothing and managed to form large businesses, and all the way down in size to lone, one-car parcel or even one-bike delivery folks who live in and work from your own neighborhood. Oh well. The ends justify the means in the mindset of the folks who propagate this sort of phenomenon.
What is the rationale for this? Who knows. Well actually I know. PROGRESSIVES. This is Fabian socialism at work. Progressivism. And the end justifies the means.
What’s wrong with that? Plenty. Here’s what’s wrong with that: Purolator competes against citizen-owned business in this country, using what is ultimately taxpayer cash. That’s an abhorrent abrogation of free market capitalism, an affront to freedom generally, and it’s pernicious to the precepts of democracy itself – all core principles upon which this country was built.
And here’s another thing that’s wrong with that: It’s not an isolated, nor even a diminishing phenomenon. It’s yet one more example of this, like the one I constantly bring up about the 100% state-owned and taxpayer-funded CBC, wherein government actually competes against TV and radio stations and networks owned by citizens. Or to put it more saliently, it’s another example of the government competing against its own citizens in business for profits. In the case of the CBC, it’s far more, and far worse, than just competing against citizens for mere profits as if that weren’t bad enough. CBC competes in the forum of ideas and politics. It’s a progressives’ dream come true, but it’s sabotaging our freedoms and democracy.
But even within that example flows another similar one:
Did you know that the 100% state-owned CBC owns 40% of what we all perceive to be the privately-owned the Sirrius Satellite Radio business in Canada? It’s true. Why? Well let’s be clear once again. It’s not freedom-lovers and free-market capitalists doing this. It’s progressives. And progressivism has no exit strategy. It’s an ongoing effort.
Throughout the period of Purolator’s state-ownership, tens of millions of dollars have been invested in Purolator to expand, over and over again, to the point where, as I said, it is now Canada’s biggest courier “company.” From their own “History” page at the Purolator web site:
1960
- Purolator began on Dec. 5, 1960, as Trans Canadian Couriers, Ltd., a subsidiary of American Courier Corp. With a staff of two, the company spent its infancy in the heart of Eastern Canada, with restricted operating licenses for the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
1993
- Canada Post Corporation purchased a 75 per cent interest in Purolator.
1999
- Canada Post Corporation purchased an additional interest in Purolator from Onex, increasing its ownership in Purolator to 95.81 per cent.
Purolator is in business to make profits. They are in business to win profits that private citizen-owned businesses are also in business to earn. They spend millions to expand their “business” to better beat the Hell out of citizen-owned business people and the families who created them (just as Purolator was started with its two employees) and hack away at them every day, and all the citizens who work for them.
And liberals are against Wal-Mart opening in their communities?
Let’s not be fooled by the slight of hand and the blurring of lines, which, it seems to me, is intentional and intentionally secretive. These “companies” are a division of the government.
Yet their own Purolator “About” page doesn’t even mention that it’s 91% owned by the state. You have to dig into their “History” page (as if regular folks would) to find this out. Or maybe just connect the dots when reviewing half of the members of their Board of Directors:
• Jacques Côté
Chief Operating Officer, Canada Post Corporation
• Bonnie Boretsky
Vice-President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Compliance, Canada Post Corporation
• Louis O’Brien
Senior Vice-President and Chief Customer Officer, Canada Post Corporation
• Wayne Cheeseman
Chief Financial Officer, Canada Post Corporation.
• Mary Traversy
Senior Vice-President, Transaction Mail, Canada Post Corporation
And don’t think it’s just plain citizens who have been fooled by this blurring of the lines. Others have been co-opted and their eyes also fail to see the line of distinction between government, and citizens in the marketplace (willfully or otherwise). Let’s look at how the National Post, which as I’ve mentioned in my writing before is in contractual cahoots with the 100% state-owned CBC to share news and advertising assets, bestows honors on what is essentially another government “corporation.” Again from Purolator’s “History” page:
2008
- For the second consecutive year Purolator is recognized as one of Canada’s 10 Most Admired Corporate Cultures™ according to the 2008 Corporate Culture Study™ conducted by Waterstone Human Capital Ltd. and the National Post.
That National Post is often seen as Canada’s most business-friendly and “conservative”-friendly newspaper. Bollocks.
And I wonder what the unions think of this:
2008
- Purolator and the Canada Council of Teamsters ratify a new four-year collective agreement.
Golly that’s shocking. Hey I wonder which political parties the unions have aided and abetted over the years in every way, including funding them with millions in union members’ cash!
I’ve long said that state-owned media should be banned in this country, and furthermore, that notion should be enshrined in the constitution. A U.S. Congressman recently introduced a bill which would effectively create a new U.S. constitutional amendment forbidding the U.S. government from owning any businesses. That’s far more strident and all-encompassing, and it’s a far more sensible solution. It’s an excellent idea, which should be supported there and in Canada.
PTBC was founded by Mr. Johannesen in 2000.
Contact Mr. Johannesen about this article using this form. Please refer to article's title.
FOLLOW @JoelJohannesen ON X!
- Say something. - Friday October 25, 2024 at 6:03 pm
- Keep going, or veer right - Monday August 26, 2024 at 4:30 pm
- Hey Joel, what is “progressive?” - Friday August 2, 2024 at 11:32 am
