The latest from our COLUMNIST SECTION:
Tuesday, Feb 01, 10:35 AMMike S. Adams
Left State University
Sunday, Jan 30, 12:41 PMDoug Giles
Hey, Chris Matthews: I Like Big Guns and I Cannot Lie
Saturday, Jan 29, 09:16 AMMichael Coren
Defender to defendant
Saturday, Jan 29, 08:46 AMSalim Mansur
U.S. can’t afford to ignore world in crisis
Sunday, Jan 23, 07:37 AMDoug Giles
Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:32 AMMike S. Adams
Kermit the Dog
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:24 AMMichael Coren
Grief or glamour?
Saturday, Jan 22, 08:11 AMSalim Mansur
Tunisia just one Arab regime going stale
Friday, Jan 21, 12:00 PMTheo Caldwell
The TSA Tea Party
Saturday, Jan 15, 07:48 AMMichael Coren
Forget blame game
Saturday, Jan 15, 07:38 AMSalim Mansur
Beware of China’s meteoric rise
Tuesday, Jan 11, 09:12 AMMike S. Adams
Welcome to Personal Responsibility 101
Monday, Jan 10, 08:12 AMDoug Giles
Snookie’s Smut or Cowboy Values?
Saturday, Jan 08, 09:44 AMMichael Coren
Tube for lefty boobs
Saturday, Jan 08, 09:42 AMSalim Mansur
Bloody start to New Year
Wednesday, Jan 05, 04:42 PMAnn Coulter
Tuesday, Jan 04, 07:20 AMMike S. Adams
Does Fort Worth Ever Cross Your Mind?
Monday, Jan 03, 11:54 AMSteven Milloy
EPA’s Mercurial Hypocrisy
Sunday, Jan 02, 09:45 AMDoug Giles
2011 Resolution: Annoy the Left 365
Sunday, Jan 02, 09:35 AMDavid Warren
Robin Hoodism is on the rise
Free-Market Capitalist Consumer Information:
These companies choose to advertise on the
(Links lead to mailing addresses)
• AIG (insur)
• Air Canada
• AOL Travel
• Bank of Montreal ("BMO")
• Best Western
• Canada Protection Plan
• Canada Revenue Agency (!)
• Canadian Tire Fin Serv
• Chip Home Income Plan
• Cold FX
• Desjardins (insurance)
• Directbuy, Inc
• Edward Jones
• General Motors
• Grand and Toy
• Grey Power (insurance)
• H&R Block
• Hilton Hotels
• iContact email marketing
• Infinity (cars)
• Koodoo mobile
• Lens Crafters
• National Post
• RBC (Royal bank)
• Rogers Cable
• Shaw Cable
• Texas Travel
• The Co-operators (ins)
• Tim Hortons
Please read more here.
PTBC Columnist Team
Columnists -- with bite! We feature conservative-friendly writers from Canada and the U.S. who help clarify the difference between liberals and conservatives. All have personally agreed to be a part of our team here at PTBC.
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
By now you have heard that Amazing Ann Coulter recently gave the loon-left a worse whoopin’ than Dan Brown’s pseudo-Albino pseudo-monk’s corporal mortification. So, foaming at the mouth, Democrats were in no condition for a coherent response to the raging question of the hour: If the U.S. had cut and run in Iraq, where would that savage and very dead thug al-Zarqawi be today?
Canada too served notice on barbarity and perversity. Our Prime Minister brilliantly stood his ground on security certificates to hold and remove alien and odious terror threats and suspects.
But the real treat was a fresh poll of Canadian morals that blew liberal abomination out of the mainstream. Conducted in April, the large survey (over 1500 participants) has a 95% accuracy. It certified basic Canadian values as only Conservatives have claimed and all others would rather die than concede.
Prostitution, extra-marital sex, “puppy-love,” even porn – the “four pillars” of the liberal “alternative” lifestyle – took a shellacking the order of Samson’s last surge of strength.
Above all, there was no confusion among Canadians about the diabolical matter of pedophilia, which you wouldn’t know from the continued disgraceful behaviour of pedosoft judges.
81% rated child molestation, the “most unforgivable behaviour.” Sure, it’s been pointed out that one might wonder why that wouldn’t be 100%. But really, do we truly believe that any community can continue to under-punish such revolting criminality without that then translating into brazen tones of approval, or at least, muted tones of disapproval.
If you go soft, long enough, even on murder, you will indeed tamper with basic moral outrage. It’s a survival mechanism. Just recall a bit of painful truth from racial history. Good people needed something they could hang on to in confronting the way the system went easy even on lynching. Criticism was equivocated by something so wanton, provoking so unsevere a legal response.
The real news is that in spite of light sentences, people remain steadfast in their view of naked evil.
In South Carolina and Oklahoma now, repeat pedophiles are eligible for the death penalty. These are the grounds that will bring capital punishment back to Canada, please The Lord.
David Brook, who teaches law, spoke for the loon-left, insisting that the “last message you want to give an offender who has the life of a child in his hands is you might as well kill the child because he’s already got the death penalty.”
Now remember these are the people who believe that the death penalty does not deter crime. So how can it have such power over criminals – smack in the middle of such a barbaric act?! How these loons give themselves away.
Next up, 74% condemned extra-marital sex. Women, the supposed weak link in the Conservative so-called gender-gap, opposed such behaviour at an even higher rate of 81%. That’s “taboo” territory. That’s Conservative majority victory margin come next federal election.
Not far behind: prostitution, rejected by 76% women, 68% overall, and under-age sex, rejected by 71% in BC – the highest in the nation – and by 65% overall. On the eve of Parliament’s raising of the age of consent to 16 from 14, what better confirmation of the conservative nature of basic Canadian values could there possibly be?
No wonder liberals don’t know where to go next. And that’s not just looking for a leader. On the one hand, the Vancouver-based extremist Pivot Legal Society released a so-called “report” on the local sex-trade, advocating safety and other regulations for the business as well as the removal of criminal provisions.
24 hours, Jimmie Pattison’s rag, carrying the story, June 14, said flat out: “In fact, Canada is behind many countries which legalize the sex-trade and have unions.” Behind? As in “backward”? “Regressive”? So now legalizing sales of women and children by body-part activity is “progressive” by definition?!
And Canada lags “behind”? Well, at least the buggers got the position right.
On the other hand, Bonnie Erbe, columnist for steadfast-lib Scripps Howard, calls for a ban on prostitution which “By its very nature … is demeaning to women and encourages anti-social, some would say depraved, behavior by men,” all the while proclaiming that “Sex is a biological function, like eating or sleeping,” and praising European laxity in sex education.
Question: if sex really is simply like sleeping then shouldn’t the only concern be silk sheets versus street corners?
Question: if sex is just like sleeping, but selling sex is “demeaning” and “depraved,” then shouldn’t selling mattresses and pillows be somewhere in the Criminal Code?
Do these people think before they spew? Can they think? Canadians certainly can.
And Canadians have proportion in approval and disapproval. In a growing awareness of one social menace after the other, alcohol abuse sported the same degree of scorn as under-age sex. Porn was next at 58% opposed. But down the list, blasphemy was opposed by just above half the population. Divorce was way down at 17% disapproval and contraception came dead last at a mere 8% opposition.
Erbe doesn’t know when to quit. She contends that “more advanced,” liberal sexual attitudes are why Western Europe has a lower teen pregnancy rate than the U.S.
Oh yea? And what role does abortion – oh, excuse me, “pregnancy prevention” – play in that statistic? Erbe stays away from the “A” word, like the Scarlet Letter. Which is interesting, since, in spite of the bone-crushingly one-sided ride that abortionists enjoy in the media, over a third of Canadians stand in opposition.
The rate is about the same as that of opposition to homosexuality, considered a “surprise” by the Research Vice-President of the firm behind the poll.
Is the anti-abortion figure also a “surprise”? If so, why?
What we have here is a failure to understand opposition. Our CP (Canadian Press) even went so far as to present the homosexual disapproval rate as if it “followed” the low divorce rate, which was coupled – for some unexplained reason – with the abortion rate. The ever so subtle hint was that homosexual opposition was – or, should be – lower than that for divorce.
All the tricks in the book. Still, Canadians aren’t buying it. They know who they are, and what they stand for.
Posted on 06/20/06 at 04:27 PM
• Please vote with your dollars to help ensure the continued availability of this site.
• If you think PTBC has no value, then don't pay anything for it. It will fade into the sunset. That's the free market at work.
• Spread the word! Email this to a friend | • Printer-Friendly | • Permalink
• Category: Anthony Oluwatoyin +
C O M M E N T S
Comments do not necessarily reflect or in any way represent the opinion of the article-writer, or the owner of this site. Claims to the contrary are spurious.
We require you to to be registered, and comment under your real name (full name), email address, and location. **EXISTING REGISTRANTS: NOTE NEW POLICY FOR COMMENTS: you must ensure that your profile includes your real, full name, and a working email address. Only comments using a real, full name, will be allowed. If we don't know you, you may be asked to prove your identity. (See this article for more.)
The correct combination penalty/treatment for pedophilia is castration, not merely chemical, but the permanent kind.
By the time pedophiles are apprehended for one criminal act, they have on average committed 50 others that they got away with. Most of the child victims have been psychologically and/or sexually damaged and some are eventually driven to suicide. So a single pedophile wreaks a wide swathe of destruction.
Pedophilia is notoriously resistant to treatment if psychiatrists are honest. However, castration works like a charm.
Since there is absolutely no chance of our leftist dominated judiciary allowing involuntary castration, then pedophiles should be given the choice: life in prison, or a chance for parole if they undergo castration. They can then live their remaining lives in society minus a sexual life that damages and even kills. This is not too high a price considering the harm they have done.
Whoa! While I totally agree with the idea of castration for all pedophiles, just because they deserve it. I do not see how it will completely solve the problem. For many if not most pedophiles, the act of raping or molesting a child has little to do with sexual gratification. It is more an act of control and degradation. Just because they are castrated does not mean they cannot cause uncurable harm to a child. And it definitely won’t stop them if they want to. More than anything I think that if a man is castrated and then released on parole, that they not only still have these sick feelings towards children, but also are now angry and insecure and more dangerous than ever.
Also if castration becomes a standard option for punishment, how then will we punish women? While many fewer women are pedophiles than men, it does still happen. Castration or mutilation of a woman could easily be seen as cruel and unusual. On top of the fact that if a woman is a pedophile it is way less likely to be about sex, and almost certainly about control.